By Emeka Chiaghanam
I once watched two old friends’ part ways on a cobbled street in Lagos. The harmattan air carried the scent of woodsmoke and damp wool as their hands met, not with ceremony, but with the easy familiarity of shared history.
Their fingers intertwined
briefly, palms pressing with unspoken understanding, before releasing with a
quiet finality. In that ordinary moment, I saw something extraordinary: the
handshake isn’t just a greeting. It’s a silent contract written in flesh and
bone, a relic of our deepest instincts.
But why do we do it? Why does
this peculiar ritual, this pressing of palms, persist across centuries and
cultures? The answer lies in the shadows of medieval marketplaces, where every
outstretched hand carried a hidden question: Friend or foe?
The Dagger Check
Picture a 14th-century trading
post. The air is thick with the metallic tang of blood from the butcher’s
stall, the sour-yeast stink of ale, the musky sweat of horses. A stranger
approaches. Your right hand, your sword hand, drifts instinctively toward your
belt. But instead of drawing steel, you open your palm. Empty. The stranger
mirrors you. Your hands clasp. Your fingers tighten just enough to feel for
hidden blades in the other’s sleeve. The shake? A final test, a jostle to
dislodge any last dagger.
This wasn’t politeness. This
was survival.
Fast forward to today: that
same gesture happens in job interviews, first dates, diplomatic meetings. We’ve
forgotten the violence baked into it, but our bodies remember. A firm grip
still signals trustworthiness; a limp hand still sets off alarms. Evolutionary
psychologists call this "haptic intuition", our ability to read
character through touch. When your boss crushes your fingers, your hindbrain
still whispers: Dominance. When a stranger’s palm is clammy, your
pulse still quickens.
The Alchemy of Touch
Close your eyes and recall the
last meaningful handshake you shared. The warmth of their skin. The slight
roughness of a laborer’s calluses or the polished smoothness of an office
worker’s palm. The faint citrus of hand sanitiser or the earthy musk of leather
from a well-worn briefcase.
Dr. Eleanor Voss, a
neuroscientist at Cambridge, explains why these details matter:
"Skin-to-skin contact triggers a cascade of oxytocin, the same hormone
that bonds mothers to infants. A good handshake isn’t just etiquette. It’s biochemistry."
This explains why Zoom meetings
leave us hollow. We might exchange words, even smiles, but without that crucial
touch, our brains never fully register the other person as real. I
learned this the hard way during lockdown, when air hugs and elbow bumps left
me feeling like a ghost. Then, at a rare in-person meeting, my editor reached
out his hand. The moment our palms met, two years of pixelated small talk
dissolved. Suddenly, we were here, together, in a way no screen
could replicate.
The Silent Language of Palms
Not all handshakes speak the
same dialect. In Botswana, a lingering grasp asks for patience. In the
Philippines, a gentle press of the knuckles shows respect. The French poignée
de main is a brisk ballet, two quick pumps, then release. Each
variation whispers cultural values: hierarchy in Japan’s bowed handshake,
egalitarianism in America’s firm grip.
Yet everywhere, the core
message remains: I come in peace.
This universality fascinates
anthropologists. Dr. Kwame Osei, who studies tribal rituals in Ghana, notes:
"Even in communities where handshakes aren’t traditional, the gesture
spreads instantly. There’s something primal about it—a language older than
words."
A Ritual Under Siege
Then came the pandemic.
Suddenly, our most instinctive greeting became suspect. We invented
alternatives—elbow bumps that felt like bad comedy, toe taps that made us look
like dancing cranes. The more creative we got, the more we ached for the real
thing.
Studies from the University of
Chicago tracked this longing. Participants who substituted waves for handshakes
reported feeling "unfinished" after interactions, as if conversations
lacked punctuation. MRI scans showed reduced activity in the brain’s social
cognition regions during touchless greetings. We evolved to need this contact.
The Future of the Handshake
Will it survive? Maybe not
unchanged. Gen Z already prefers fist bumps—quicker, cooler, less formal.
Globalisation introduces new norms; Japanese executives now practice firmer
grips for Western business deals. Some predict the handshake will fade like
hat-tipping or curtsies.
But I doubt it.
Because beneath every modern
adaptation, the ancient need remains: to prove we’re not threats. To bridge the
gap between you and me. To say, without
words, I trust you enough to let you feel my pulse.
Next time you shake hands, try
this: pause mid-grasp. Feel the life thrumming against your skin—the slight
moisture, the subtle pressure, the unique topography of their palm. That’s not
just a greeting. That’s the echo of a thousand medieval marketplaces, a million
cautious first meetings, an unbroken chain of humans saying: Let’s take
this chance.
The daggers are gone. The trust
remains. And perhaps that’s the most remarkable evolution of all.
Post a Comment