Nigerian Security Agencies' Reluctance in the Face of Rising Insecurities

By Polycarp Onwubiko

Sadly, Nigerian security agencies have conclusively proven that they are reluctant to defend ethno-religious groups being serially attacked by Islamic militia terrorists masquerading as herders imported from the Sahel region of West Africa to occupy the ancestral homelands of Christians in the Middle Belt states.

How shameful was the reason given by the Chief of Army Staff that the army troop could not be dispatched to the flashpoints in Plateau State villages to wipe out the terrorists because of difficult terrains? Do Nigerians need any more proof that some top security agency officials are in cahoots with the religious militia? Who is fooling whom?

Of course, the security agencies take dictation from the real owners of the APC who are overtly behind the Islamic militia terrorists ravaging Christian communities in Southern Kaduna and the Middle Belt region. The time-honored saying that "You can deceive some of the people some of the time but not all the people all the time" has been conclusively proved in the intractable and pervasive insecurities in Nigeria.

The standard best practice the world over, especially in federations with a multi-level policing structure, has been scorned by the owners of the APC, which dictates what should be done in the "already expired Nigeria." They insist on a centralized security architecture that enables foot soldiers for Islamization to cover all the terrain and forests in the county and act with impunity and monstrosities while going scot-free.

Common sense dictates that if the realistic security architecture, which is multi-level policing, cannot be allowed, the tendency for people being slaughtered like chickens is to bear arms for self-defense. This is allowed by the United Nations.

 

Polycarp Onwubiko, Public Policy Analyst

 

 

 

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post