Peter Obi, Labour Party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 election, has once again described fuel subsidy as an organized crime.
Obi on Monday made this
statement while featuring on Arise TV’s ‘The Morning Show’. He stated that
although he agreed with the decision to remove the fuel subsidy, he would have
taken a different approach in implementing the policy.
“Fuel subsidy is organized
crime. I said it repeatedly that it should be removed. For me, the approach
would have been, is to remove the corruption and criminal side of it and remove
the excess demand.
“By doing this, you would have
reduced it by 50 per cent. The remaining 50 per cent is what we would have been
able to, after consultation with various stakeholders to find a way in an
organised manner, remove and show the proceed of the gains of the removal to be
invested in critical development areas” he said.
Responding to a question on the
challenges in the foreign exchange market, Obi reiterated that things could have
been done differently.
He explained that the pressure
on the FX is due to the lack of sufficient supply to float the naira against
the dollar.
According to the former
governor, the government should have consulted their economy team in ensuring
the supply of FX, albeit putting in place initiatives to encourage export.
“You can’t float a currency you
don’t have supply with. It’s like building a non-gated house in a
criminal-ridden society. You have to have a defence mechanism. Nobody floats
what you don’t have a supply for. I believe that now that we have new CBN leadership,
they have to look at the overall monetary policy. It’s again not something you
announce haphazardly. It’s something you look at critically. Nobody floats his
currency without having an adequate supply. When you don’t have adequate
supply, there will be pressure and criminality. We should have worked on
eliminating those criminality and excesses in our FX regime,” he said.
Speaking on how his party would have approached the conundrum, he stated that they would have opted for the devaluation of the naira instead of leaving it open to market forces by floating the currency.
“What we would have done is
devalue the currency to about 600 or thereabout while trying to manage what you
have and encouraging exports. I can tell you not even in the developed world
has anybody left their currency to market forces because you might not be able
to control it. After all, you cannot reverse your policy.
These are announcement defects
that would have been well thought through by a proper economic team and
consultation,” he added.
Post a Comment