A version of this article was first published in my June 21, 2014 column. It is still relevant today.
The other day I was reflecting on Nigerians’ new favorite pastime: endless griping about the increasingly disabling dysfunction of the country. And I realized that one theme that often stands out when we bewail our present conditions is that we almost always sentimentalize the past.
In other words, many Nigerians
find relief from the worries of the present by taking a mental escape to the
past.
For instance, when Nigerians
bemoan the “indigene/settler” dichotomies in many states of the country, they
like to recall, for example, that as far back as 1956, a Fulani man from Sokoto
by the name of Malam Umaru Altine was elected the first Mayor of Enugu, the
political capital of Eastern Nigeria. His religious and ethnic identity didn’t
stand in the way of his election—as it certainly would in contemporary Nigeria.
They also remember that when
the late Alhaji Abubakar Rimi was governor of Kano State in the Second
Republic, he appointed many non-Kano indigenes, including Christians from the
South, as advisers and directors. There are several other examples of
inclusiveness from the past that we invoke to deplore the politics of
intolerance and exclusivity of the present.
[It should be noted, though,
that Vice President Kashim Shettima, as governor of Borno State, blazed a trail
in appointing southern Christians as cabinet-level advisers and aides. He
appointed a certain Ifeanyi Onwubuya as his Chief Detail. Chief Kester Ogualili
was his Special Adviser on Community Relations. One Christopher Godwin Akaba
served as his Special Assistant. Babagana Zulum, Shettima’s successor, appears
to be continuing with the tradition.
Lagos State governors, including the current one, have also historically been ethnically ecumenical in their choice of gubernatorial aides and advisers. They usually have advisers from representative parts of the country. There are probably other “inclusive” governors like Lagos and Borno governors that I am not aware of. I welcome any information that helps me to expand my knowledge of this.
But, of course, this won’t earn our praise or
become a reference point of inclusivity, even if it is only merely tokenistic,
because it’s still in the present. It takes the passage of time to valorize
gestures like this.]
And when Nigerians bemoan the
worsening insecurity in the country, especially in the northeast, they never
fail to recall that Borno State, the main theater of Boko Haram’s unceasing carnage,
used to be so peaceful that its license-plate slogan is “home of peace.” Now, that slogan reads like a cruel joke.
On almost every imaginable
subject—infrastructure, electricity, standard of education, tolerance,
security, governance, leadership, etc.—our past has become our refuge from the
scourge of our present. About the only area that Nigerians don’t look to the
past for inspiration is telecommunication. No one looks back to the days of
NITEL with nostalgia even in the face of the crappy GSM services that private
telecom operators provide now.
I know of no society that valorizes its past,
in even the most trivial indices, with as much wistfulness as Nigeria does.
Here in the United States, to give just one example, rather than a sentimental
longing for the past, I notice a tendency toward chronocentricity, that is, the
notion that the present is superior to anything that preceded it.
For instance, when Americans
discuss race relations, they look back at their past with disdain. Even though they
are far from achieving racial equality, they all seem to agree that they have
come a long way; that every subsequent generation is more racially tolerant and
broadminded than the one that anteceded it.
As some Black American leaders
have pointed out, the fact that racial incidents like the Trayvon Martin murder
case captured the national imagination and became the subject of intense
national debate speaks to the unusualness of such cases and indicates how much
progress has been made in race relations.
Although Americans also complain about declining standards in education, it isn’t as much a national obsession as it is in Nigeria. In fact, studies now show that young Americans actually read more print (and—obviously—electronic) books than did previous generations.
In many societies, people say
things like “this is the 21st century, for God’s sake!” to rail against people
who are narrow-minded, who are ensconced in their primordial cocoons, who are
opposed to progress. Implicit in this utterance is the idea that the current
age is an improvement on the previous ones; that history proceeds in a
progressive, not a recursive, direction. Of course, this is not entirely
accurate, but it does capture a certain level of confidence about the
present—and optimism about the future.
Nigerians don’t have even this
illusory luxury. The past is a lot more comforting than the present and is
therefore a better template for the future. But why wouldn’t it be? As a nation
we seem to be moving from bad to worse in almost every sphere.
At a time when most closed
societies are opening up and open societies are becoming even more open, we are
becoming more wedded to subnational loyalties than ever before.
And stealing of public money no
longer makes headline news unless it’s in millions or billions of US dollars.
What is more, we have become so desensitized to death that unless people die in
their hundreds, newspaper editors don’t put it on the front page.
Even universities that are
called “ivory towers” because of their putative insulation from the reality of
everyday life are affected by this national culture of worshiping the past.
University teachers look to the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s to reclaim the idea of
the university.
I have never heard or read any
Nigerian university teacher brag about improvement in scholarship and pedagogy
in the universities in the course of the years.
No future can be envisioned out of this depressingly dark present. That is why we glorify and idealize the past. But a country whose past is better than its present in most indices of human development is in a bigger trouble than it realizes. And, most certainly, a country whose future lies in its past has no future.
But, wait! Are we, perhaps,
guilty of a phenomenon that psychologists call “rosy retrospection”? That is,
the human tendency to look at the past more positively than the present because
it has faded from our active memory.
When I look at the archives of
the past that we sentimentalize today, I see the same lamentations of decline
and dysfunction that we have become accustomed to. Is it a case of every epoch
is the worst until it is succeeded by another— and the passage of time and the
frailty of human memory wash off its ugliness?
Bille People in Both Rivers and
Adamawa States?
My friend Professor Moses
Ochonu called my attention to a status update shared by the sensationally
impressive polyglot known as Adedeji Odulesi in which he talked about an
ethnolinguistic group called Bille, which he said is found in the “Demsa and
Mayobelwa” local government areas of Adamawa State and in the “Degema Local Government
Area” of Rivers State.
He said the dialects of the
Bille language in Adamawa and Rivers states are still mutually intelligible,
i.e., they understand each other in spite of the wide geographic, historical,
and cultural separation between them.
“Both claim to be brothers and
do visit one another,” he wrote. “The Bille from Adamawa are said to have
visited their kith and kin in Rivers in 2001, 2012 and during the installation
of their new king.”
If this is true, it’s truly
intriguing and thought-provoking because it defies our conventional
understanding of language and people. It would serve as another evidence of the
labyrinthine complexity of ethnic identities in Nigeria.
After reading of this, I
decided to search up “Bille language” and “Bille people.” The results I got
were jarring. All the articles I read about the “Bille people” talk of only
Rivers State. There is no mention of them in Adamawa State.
On the other hand, articles about the “Bille language” talk about the language in Adamawa State. There is no indication I can find anywhere that the language can also be found in Rivers State.
Yet Odulesi isn’t a flippant
person. But is there a Bille person in either Rivers State or Adamawa State who
can confirm what Odulesi said about them? I would really appreciate it.
Should this turn out to be
true, it would be a chapter in my forthcoming book on collective identity
construction in Nigeria. Please share with people who are from these places.
Post a Comment