By Stella Obi
The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal
sitting in Ibadan, on Friday, dismissed the petition filed by the Action
Alliance’s (AA) candidate in the March 18, 2023 election, Mr Babatunde Ajala,
against Governor Seyi Makinde’s victory.
The three-man tribunal, led by Justice Ejiro
Emudaihohwo, in a unanimous ruling dismissed the petition and awarded a cost of
N600,000 against him.
In the petition, INEC was the first
responded, while Governor Seyi Makinde was the second respondent. The PDP was
the third respondent.
Representing Governor Seyi Makinde was Mr
Kunle Kalajaiye, while Mr. Isiaka Olagunju (SAN) was the counsel for PDP.
Prior to the ruling, counsel to AA and its
candidate, Etibo Orowo King, had informed the tribunal that the party and its
candidate had decided to discontinue the case. He then urged the tribunal to
strike out the case in the interest of the state.
He said: “My prayer is for the cancellation
of the result of the election. But, on further reevaluation, we decided to
discontinue the case in the interest of peace and tranquility.”
Speaking with journalists after the judgment,
Kalejaiye said: “The Electoral Act needs to be amended to create a threshold
that if you have not scored at least a quarter of all the total votes cast in a
state, you should not come to the election tribunal. The three judges left
their jurisdictions to come and sit for a petition that is dead on arrival. So,
only serious petitioners will have access to court. This is a call for the
amendment of Electoral Act.”
“But there is one thing that is very clear
which I made known to the tribunal. Candidates and political parties who
performed abysmally in an election should not be allowed to come to court to
waste judicial time. Where a political party only scored 387 votes and
challenged a person who scored 563, 617 votes in all the 33 local governments
is a waste of judicial time.
“This is the end of the petition brought by
Action Alliance against the emergence of Governor Seyi Makinde in the March 18
election. The petition was essentially to ask for a rerun of the election on
the basis that the candidate that was cleared for the election was not the
candidate that was filled by the party.
“The petition was filed, and we responded to
it, only for us to come this morning and find out that the party and the
candidates claimed that they had looked at the petition again and they were not
sure that they would succeed, and they brought an application to withdraw the
petition.”
Post a Comment